Asus MAXIMUS V GENE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS V GENE  (all builds)
Memory12.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.2 GHz
Display1862 x 1036 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130819
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 22:35
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User URY-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
76% Very good
Memory 95
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 162
72% 119 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 434
47% 372 Pts
64-Core 450
28% 450 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.2% Poor
Lighting 36.7
Reflection 40.9
Parallax 38.5
30% 38.7 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 39
Splatting 27.3
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.2%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$70
430GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61130WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 303 408 428 465 455 477 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 346
Write 343
Mixed 325
SusWrite 423
81% 359 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 54.4
4K Mixed 30.8
94% 34.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 269
219% 310 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR3-2400 CL10 4GB 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.2% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 27
MC Mixed 23.9
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 18.5
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 57.2
70% 57.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS V GENE Builds (Compare 798 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V GENE - $972

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,364
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback