TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Hyrican GA-Q77M-D2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHyrican GA-Q77M-D2H  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte Q77M-D2H
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 08 '22 at 00:58
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User SRB-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
69.5% Good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 95.3
2-Core 174
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 478
48% 390 Pts
64-Core 480
30% 480 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 69.5%
 Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 52.3
Reflection 53.8
Parallax 48.9
43% 51.7 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 47.8
Splatting 43.1
41% 51.1 fps
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 42%
 Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKJ3A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 419 405 407 126 35 38 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.1% Very good
Read 388
Write 429
Mixed 364
SusWrite 238
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 61.8
4K Mixed 31.6
111% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 223
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 191
171% 254 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑
This bench: 77.1%
 Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
240GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 111 114 113 114 114 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 109
Write 111
Mixed 66
SusWrite 113
73% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
127% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑
This bench: 63.5%
 Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905403-181.A00LF 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 9905471-011.A00LF 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 74.7
54% 74.7 ns
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-Q77M-D2H Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Hyrican GA-Q77M-D2H

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples17x
Core i5-2400Intel  $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples1x
Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples1x
GPU
GTX 1650Nvidia  $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples17x
HD 6870AMDBench 15%, 25,443 samples1x
RX 480AMD  $75Bench 46%, 261,163 samples1x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples17x
RBUSNS8280S3128GH2 128GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,212 samples1x
MX500 500GBCrucial  $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples1x
RAM
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 2x4GBNanyaBench 54%, 1,719 samples4x
M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG Kingston 9905471-011.A00LF 12GBUnknownBench 46%, 2 samples2x
9905471-011.A00LF 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 830B M2X4G64CB8HG5N-DG 12GBKingstonBench 44%, 2 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $480
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback