Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$38 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Memory 42.9 1-Core 19.3 2-Core 51.2 24% 37.8 Pts	4-Core 103 8-Core 139 15% 121 Pts	64-Core 128 8% 128 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 68%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TY256HDHP-000L7 256GB 4,113 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT04L6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	Read 134 Write 117 Mixed 103 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 10.9 4K Mixed 6.8 24% 8.07 MB/s	DQ Read 192 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 186 139% 184 MB/s
Poor: 56% Great: 112%
SanDisk' Cruzer Fit 16GB 1,420 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 10GB free, PID 5571 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 12.9 Write 6.2 Mixed 14.7 14% 11.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.3 18% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x2GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	23.3% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 8.3 25% 8.77 GB/s	SC Read 3.4 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 3.3 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 189 21% 189 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 54%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	1,747x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	654x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	495x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	346x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	216x
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	177x

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $231

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16