PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 1.54% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 13 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus P5K SE (all builds) |
Memory | 1 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20090625 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Jan 12 '22 at 20:05 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 94% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
31.4%
Below average
|
33% 51.7 Pts
|
9% 70.2 Pts
|
5% 76.5 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GeForce 9500 GT
Device(0000 0000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 309.08
|
1.54%
Terrible
|
1% 1.47 fps
|
2% 2.27 fps
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Unknown 3GB
null MHz
512, 1024, 512, 1024 MB
|
11.7%
Very poor
|
11% 3.73 GB/s
|
8% 2.9 GB/s
|
26% 156 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $85Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 31x |
Core2 Duo E6550Intel $15Bench 37%, 11,349 samples | 16x |
Core2 Duo E8200Intel $12Bench 40%, 4,318 samples | 13x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GeForce 9600 GTNvidiaBench 4%, 20,826 samples | 9x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 8x |
GeForce 8600 GTNvidiaBench 2%, 8,099 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 58% - Above average | Total price: $85 |