Acer TravelMate P249-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAcer TravelMate P249-M  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Lynx_SK
Memory6.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190530
Uptime1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 17:27
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.3% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 74.6
2-Core 133
53% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 204
26% 198 Pts
64-Core 201
12% 201 Pts
Poor: 17%
This bench: 48.3%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)
Acer(1025 1133) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 24.20.100.6286
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.87 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.67 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
300GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71F1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 108 2.2 62 70 10 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 207
Write 96.9
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 94.6
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 9.9
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 7.8
33% 11 MB/s
DQ Read 15.7
DQ Write 16.5
DQ Mixed 15.8
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.7
MC Mixed 16.3
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P249-M Builds (Compare 30 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P249-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $38
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549WD Black SN850X M.2 4TB $293
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback