Samsung 730QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics18.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive150% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 730QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QED-KA1US
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateDec 07 '22 at 15:34
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 44.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 223
69% 131 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 666
61% 510 Pts
64-Core 880
54% 880 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C876) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.2079
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
18.4% Very poor
Lighting 22.1
Reflection 25.6
Parallax 24.8
18% 24.2 fps
MRender 22.1
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 19.4
19% 23.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 18.4%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1012 1122 1156 1026 281 369 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
150% Outstanding
Read 589
Write 1,292
Mixed 1,266
SusWrite 828
227% 993 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 39.3
158% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 769
DQ Write 475
DQ Mixed 633
469% 626 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 150%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 52.1
MC Mixed 41.6
125% 43.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 18.2
54% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 183
22% 183 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 109%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730QED Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 730QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback