Samsung 730QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive196% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 730QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP730QED-KA1US
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 09 '22 at 20:46
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1255U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.7 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 58
1-Core 168
2-Core 297
91% 174 Pts
4-Core 443
8-Core 669
69% 556 Pts
64-Core 639
40% 639 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D C876) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3790
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
13% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 20.7
Parallax 19.4
12% 18.1 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16.8
16% 19.7 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 13%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
130GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1609 597 309 301 235 158 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
196% Outstanding
Read 1,172
Write 1,274
Mixed 1,254
SusWrite 535
238% 1,059 MB/s
4K Read 57.8
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 68
244% 85.5 MB/s
DQ Read 830
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1,039
757% 975 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 196%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCR 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 4267 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
130% Outstanding
MC Read 45.7
MC Write 55.7
MC Mixed 50.9
145% 50.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 43.6
SC Mixed 25.1
80% 28.1 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 130%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 730QED Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 730QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback