Medion E14308

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 7.88%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics1.12% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMedion E14308  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION NS1xAD
Memory1.2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210811
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD 3020e Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Memory 5.6
1-Core 40.4
2-Core 57.7
18% 34.6 Pts
4-Core 57.8
8-Core 61
8% 59.4 Pts
64-Core 76.2
5% 76.2 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 47%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RadeonT Graphics
Device(2782 1100) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.30
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
1.12% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.5
Splatting 2
1% 1.47 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.12%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
S11-128G-PHISON-SSD-B16 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMBB.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 239
Write 178
Mixed 189
45% 202 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 9.9
34% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 37.4
DQ Write 29.5
DQ Mixed 33.6
25% 33.5 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6CJR6N-VK 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.6% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 8
24% 8.53 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 4.7
16% 5.6 GB/s
Latency 447
9% 447 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E14308 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Medion E14308

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback