HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 29%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics5.07% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive19.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8054
Memory7.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170328
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 14:13
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
22.9% Poor
Memory 6.35
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 146
36% 75.5 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 252
31% 236 Pts
64-Core 251
16% 251 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 8054) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.07% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.2
4% 5.5 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.5
Splatting 9.3
6% 7.37 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.07%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
ESA3ASA2TTT1TT256GB 256GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1208
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 39 25 22 36 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
19.7% Very poor
Read 268
Write 167
Mixed 143
SusWrite 27.9
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 1.5
10% 5.03 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 83.3
DQ Mixed 25.7
39% 74.9 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 19.7%
Great: 84%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
88GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 97 98 96 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
56.8% Above average
Read 100
Write 101
Mixed 72.9
SusWrite 97.3
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851U6CJR6N-UH M378A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
26% Poor
MC Read 10.6
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 6.8
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 8.7
SC Mixed 5.4
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 439
9% 439 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 26%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF Builds (Compare 2,999 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G2 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback