Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive124% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMonster ABRA A7 V9.2  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A7 V9.2
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180719
Uptime6.5 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 07:07
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 187
74% 125 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 430
43% 348 Pts
64-Core 540
33% 540 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
Clevo(1558 872B) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2225
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 38.7
32% 39.6 fps
MRender 38
Gravity 40
Splatting 27.3
28% 35.1 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 31%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX6000 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$40
133GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V6005-ac Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 633 654 711 738 661 578 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Read 607
Write 566
Mixed 572
SusWrite 662
136% 602 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 37.2
136% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 395
DQ Mixed 290
245% 355 MB/s
Poor: 66%
This bench: 124%
Great: 153%
Seagate ST1000LM049-2GH172 1TB
694GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 134 147 124 101 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
63.4% Good
Read 95.3
Write 78.3
Mixed 66
SusWrite 126
67% 91.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown $5 - 859B CT8G4SFS8266.M8FB 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 25.8
MC Mixed 20.8
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.4
57% 20.1 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A7 V9.2 Builds (Compare 51 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A7 V9.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback