HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive87.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G3 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8061
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200428
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 07:02
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$60
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 82.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 204
74% 129 Pts
4-Core 402
8-Core 406
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 401
25% 401 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
744GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 349 357 361 358 361 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 352
Write 446
Mixed 338
SusWrite 361
85% 374 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 62.9
4K Mixed 39.9
113% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 253
216% 319 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 117%
Revuahn 880K256GB 256GB
110GB free
Firmware: AE0115G
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 427 425 426 425 425 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
92% Outstanding
Read 481
Write 425
Mixed 305
SusWrite 424
92% 409 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 34.1
116% 41.8 MB/s
DQ Read 270
DQ Write 214
DQ Mixed 196
159% 227 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 92%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT8G4DFRA32A.C8FP Samsung M378A1K43BB1-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
72% Very good
MC Read 26
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 21.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 21.7
62% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 75.9
53% 75.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProDesk 400 G3 MT Builds (Compare 1,138 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G3 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback