Neousys Nuvo-7000 Series

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemNeousys Nuvo-7000 Series  (all builds)
MotherboardNeousys NVS-7000
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210616
Uptime6.9 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 04:56
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User CHN-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 87.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 226
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 730
71% 581 Pts
64-Core 1,020
63% 1,020 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 11BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28% Poor
Lighting 35.4
Reflection 39.1
Parallax 36.2
29% 36.9 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 37
Splatting 25.6
26% 33.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMF-S25V2-128GDSBC 128GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFMA615
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 149 46 65 84 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
69.2% Good
Read 436
Write 259
Mixed 294
SusWrite 116
61% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 67.4
4K Mixed 28.5
115% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 156
137% 199 MB/s
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D23.23289S.001 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.3% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 13.6
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Nuvo-7000 Series Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Neousys Nuvo-7000 Series

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback