Nexstgo NS14N1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 36%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.03% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemNexstgo NS14N1  (all builds)
MotherboardNexstgo NS14N1
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 06 '22 at 01:31
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8250U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.3% Below average
Memory 29.1
1-Core 60.7
2-Core 117
37% 68.8 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 261
30% 234 Pts
64-Core 257
16% 257 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Device(1DC2 3107) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 7.4
Gravity 5.6
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.27 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 512GB 512GB
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0703A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 299 332 343 355 372 369 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 284
Write 271
Mixed 241
SusWrite 345
64% 285 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 44.3
4K Mixed 16.9
75% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 213
DQ Mixed 47.5
78% 149 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 211%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
34.4% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 11.9
SC Mixed 7.3
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 260
15% 260 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NS14N1 Builds (Compare 6 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Nexstgo NS14N1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $35
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback