PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Intel Thurley |
Motherboard | Huanan X58 (all builds) |
Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | Цвета: 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20170307 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 05 '22 at 21:10 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | RUS-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5670
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
|
68.1%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 527.37
|
17.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 50 104 43 133 45 MB/s
|
27.6%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$32
653GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 140 139 139 142 141 MB/s
|
85.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-CK0 M393B1K70DH0-CK0 Winbond W25X/Q32 52GB
1600, 1600, 33 MHz
8192, 8192, 36864 MB
|
40.8%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 5x |
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 4x |
Xeon X5687IntelBench 74%, 1,801 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 5x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
GTX 650 Ti BoostNvidia $140Bench 17%, 15,701 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 38% - Below average | Total price: $121 |