User System

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics70.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive85.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHUANANZHI
MotherboardHUANANZHI X99-T8 GAMING
Memory53.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210915
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 17:01
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2673 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
65.6% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 72.5
2-Core 141
58% 97.1 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 538
49% 413 Pts
64-Core 1200
74% 1200 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.3% Very good
Lighting 92.8
Reflection 89
Parallax 77.1
76% 86.3 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 81.2
Splatting 72.9
60% 73.2 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme 128GB 128GB
115GB free
Firmware: R0629A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 570 573 169 87 97 99 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 1,218
Write 574
Mixed 678
SusWrite 266
151% 684 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 61
4K Mixed 31.9
127% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 418
DQ Write 271
DQ Mixed 54.4
119% 248 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 119%
Great: 170%
JSYERA-S100360SSD 360GB
168GB free
Firmware: 2A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 295 204 67 43 41 44 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
58.5% Above average
Read 463
Write 401
Mixed 367
SusWrite 116
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 47.7
4K Mixed 18
79% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 184
DQ Write 232
DQ Mixed 1
58% 139 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 69%
Nvme 128GB 128GB
19GB free
Firmware: R0629A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 60 60 60 61 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
93.7% Outstanding
Read 1,408
Write 121
Mixed 246
SusWrite 66.2
98% 460 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 10.8
85% 23.4 MB/s
DQ Read 352
DQ Write 62.8
DQ Mixed 15.6
61% 143 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 93.7%
Great: 170%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$155
949GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 020
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 326 394 404 407 405 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
85.5% Excellent
Read 448
Write 422
Mixed 398
SusWrite 373
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 25.6
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 33
106% 35.4 MB/s
DQ Read 233
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 247
190% 256 MB/s
Poor: 83%
This bench: 85.5%
Great: 125%
Nvme 256GB 256GB
7GB free
Firmware: R0629A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,436
Write 1,160
Mixed 988
265% 1,195 MB/s
4K Read 35.7
4K Write 59.1
4K Mixed 33.3
128% 42.7 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 226
DQ Mixed 79.8
114% 215 MB/s
Poor: 96% Great: 200%
Nvme 128GB 128GB
111GB free
Firmware: R0629A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 562 567 471 88 85 89 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
130% Outstanding
Read 1,429
Write 523
Mixed 662
SusWrite 310
161% 731 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 31.6
130% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 65.6
123% 247 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 130%
Great: 170%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YK0 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
MC Read 39.7
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 32
103% 36 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 17.7
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 121%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback