Apple iMac14,3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.08% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive85.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemApple iMac14,3  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-77EB7D7DAF985301
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170821
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 08 '17 at 13:00
Run Duration91 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4570S
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 103
2-Core 194
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 375
50% 371 Pts
64-Core 374
23% 374 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
Apple(106B 011E) 1GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1254 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 382.5
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Lighting 9
Reflection 8.27
Parallax 10.5
7% 9.26 fps
MRender 12.2
Gravity 10.7
Splatting 11.9
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 1TB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 499
Write 431
Mixed 447
102% 459 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 26.6
85% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 82.6
114% 210 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 96%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 18.2
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 20.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical iMac14,3 Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple iMac14,3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 32% - Below average Total price: $140
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback