AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateDec 04 '22 at 10:34
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.8% Average
Memory 50.5
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 141
49% 87.1 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 185
27% 196 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1994
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.23% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 2.6
Parallax 2.6
2% 2.63 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 1.4
Splatting 2
2% 2.97 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.23%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kston 256GB 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0514A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 313 351 341 333 326 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
71.9% Very good
Read 426
Write 356
Mixed 307
SusWrite 332
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 17.2
87% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 30.6
72% 143 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Anucell Holding 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
27.6% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.5
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 4.2
17% 6 GB/s
Latency 159
25% 159 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.6%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback