AMI Intel

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAMI Intel  (all builds)
MotherboardAMI Intel
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211213
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 13 '22 at 14:18
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N5095
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 60.8
1-Core 77.1
2-Core 153
55% 96.9 Pts
4-Core 293
8-Core 295
39% 294 Pts
64-Core 296
18% 296 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
2.62% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.2
Parallax 3.3
2% 3.13 fps
MRender 4
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.73 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.62%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kston 256GB 256GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 264 340 305 335 321 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 379
Write 300
Mixed 277
SusWrite 308
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 82.5
4K Mixed 16.5
90% 38.6 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 29.2
72% 145 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 139%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Anucell Holding 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
39.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 12.3
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 13.4
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel Builds (Compare 462 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: AMI Intel

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback