HP 750-167c

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	HP 750-167c (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B47
Memory	8.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150924
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '22 at 03:22
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$79 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	57.5% Above average	Memory 72.3 1-Core 89 2-Core 172 64% 111 Pts	4-Core 242 8-Core 278 34% 260 Pts	64-Core 274 17% 274 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57.5% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% EVGA(3842 1970) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.37 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.7% Very poor	Lighting 17.9 Reflection 35 Parallax 23.8 15% 25.6 fps	MRender 39.9 Gravity 24.1 Splatting 25.4 24% 29.8 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 17.7% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 413GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.01A03 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 27 65 73 88 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 52.9 Write 87.7 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 75.2 45% 61.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.3 56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 109%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB-$78 30,011 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 47GB free Firmware: MK7OA840 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 117 115 117 116 116 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	68% Good	Read 121 Write 134 Mixed 73.6 SusWrite 116 82% 111 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 167% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 82%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GB 618 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 8192 MB Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	40.6% Average	MC Read 14.2 MC Write 14.6 MC Mixed 13.9 41% 14.2 GB/s	SC Read 10 SC Write 12.6 SC Mixed 11.6 33% 11.4 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 56%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 750-167c Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP 750-167c

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $79Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	22x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x

GPU
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	2x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	2x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
840 Pro 512GBSamsung $129Bench 96%, 14,996 samples	2x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $75Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	2x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8A-PB Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 12GBHynixBench 41%, 618 samples	16x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 Hynix HMT451U6BFR8A-PB 12GBSamsungBench 43%, 246 samples	3x
M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 7,002 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $173

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16