HP 550-240nf

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.59% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP 550-240nf  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20161007
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 22:30
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
60.2% Good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 88.2
2-Core 176
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 253
34% 254 Pts
64-Core 248
15% 248 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
HP(103C 2B47) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6446
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
4.59% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 5.4
4% 5.3 fps
MRender 6.7
Gravity 4.9
Splatting 8.3
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.59%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
572GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 40 41 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
26.1% Poor
Read 432
Write 39.8
Mixed 52.9
SusWrite 40
30% 141 MB/s
4K Read 12.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 2.2
23% 5.43 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 26.1%
Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 158 157 152 157 158 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 68
Write 137
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 157
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
59% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TIMETEC-UD3-1600 Hynix HMT41GU6BFR8A-PB 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.5
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 17
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.5 GB/s
Latency 86.6
46% 86.6 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-240nf Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-240nf

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback