Lenovo 90AV001NFR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 90AV001NFR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 17:57
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 78.5
1-Core 90.8
2-Core 162
65% 110 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 282
37% 280 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 457.51
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 41.3
Parallax 38.7
31% 39.3 fps
MRender 38.1
Gravity 39.1
Splatting 27.6
28% 34.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
570GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 269 401 417 444 395 392 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 470
Write 438
Mixed 398
SusWrite 386
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 72.5
4K Mixed 44.5
145% 49.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 341
DQ Mixed 290
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown RMR5030ME68F9F1600 Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 12GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
37.1% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 13.6
MC Mixed 10.3
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 83.4
48% 83.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 90AV001NFR Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: Lenovo 90AV001NFR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $429
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback