Wortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.26% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemWortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712  (all builds)
MotherboardClevo W2xxCZQ
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131118
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 17:48
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 1037U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
29.7% Poor
Memory 51.4
1-Core 43.4
2-Core 52
33% 48.9 Pts
4-Core 48
8-Core 52.2
7% 50.1 Pts
64-Core 52
3% 52 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 52%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)
Clevo(1558 2400) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
1.26% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 0.5
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.1 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 1
Splatting 1.8
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.26%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
270GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 380 381 391 362 418 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 376
Write 235
Mixed 288
SusWrite 383
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 36.4
4K Mixed 28.7
89% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 83.1
DQ Mixed 103
79% 108 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S4G64CC88B4N-DI Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
29.7% Poor
MC Read 9.2
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.1
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 6.07 GB/s
Latency 155
26% 155 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712 Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Wortmann_ag TERRA_MOBILE_1512/1712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback