Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
18 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z170-HD3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170-HD3  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180309
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '22 at 14:33
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel 0000
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 76.5
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 180
67% 116 Pts
4-Core 330
8-Core 531
53% 431 Pts
64-Core 680
42% 680 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85BF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.4% Good
Lighting 75.6
Reflection 78
Parallax 71.8
62% 75.1 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 73.9
Splatting 70.4
58% 70.8 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 60%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.51% Terrible
Lighting 7
Reflection 9.4
Parallax 8.2
6% 8.2 fps
MRender 11.1
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11.2
8% 9.73 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.51%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3701101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 31 31 30 30 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
601GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 182 179 181 182 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 173
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 181
113% 154 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 105%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown JHD2666U1908JG 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
63.6% Good
MC Read 27.8
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 18.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 20.7
54% 18.9 GB/s
Latency 87.3
46% 87.3 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170-HD3-CF Builds (Compare 1,642 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3 - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $581
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback