Lenovo 42844KG

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics3.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 42844KG  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 42844KG
Memory13.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130726
Uptime11.5 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 13:51
Run Duration108 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 35%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2670QM-$200
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
58.7% Above average
Memory 78.7
1-Core 64.5
2-Core 126
55% 89.9 Pts
4-Core 210
8-Core 335
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 352
22% 352 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 1000M
Legend(17AA 21D1) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.55
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
3.03% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.6
Parallax 2
3% 3.73 fps
MRender 5.6
Gravity 3.4
Splatting 3.2
3% 4.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.03%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
BT58SSD09S 240GB
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 34 1.9 3.1 49 1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 473
Write 330
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 25.5
45% 208 MB/s
4K Read 4.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.1
8% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT102464BF160B.C16 Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 859B BLS4G3N18AES4.16FE 859B CT102464BF160B.C16 24GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
45.1% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 14.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 13.6
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 83.1
48% 83.1 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 42844KG Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 42844KG

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback