Skikk SAGA 17 II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics59.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive290% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSkikk SAGA 17 II  (all builds)
MotherboardSKIKK.eu Saga 17 II RTX 3050
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220908
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 12:37
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 72.2
1-Core 189
2-Core 363
108% 208 Pts
4-Core 683
8-Core 1,143
111% 913 Pts
64-Core 1,778
110% 1,778 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 100%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3050 Laptop GPU
Clevo(1558 867D) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1640
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
59.5% Above average
Lighting 78.1
Reflection 76.1
Parallax 67.3
64% 73.8 fps
MRender 72.5
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 60
52% 63.6 fps
Poor: 36%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$88
645GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1612 1649 1676 1723 1711 602 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
290% Outstanding
Read 1270
Write 1,744
Mixed 1,471
SusWrite 1,496
339% 1,495 MB/s
4K Read 62.8
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 90.1
299% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 1,403
DQ Write 1,047
DQ Mixed 1,190
899% 1,213 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 290%
Great: 365%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3200C22-16GRS 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
53.2% Above average
MC Read 19.8
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 17.3
53% 18.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.8
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 96.3
42% 96.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SAGA 17 II Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 95%
Nuclear submarine

System: Skikk SAGA 17 II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback