Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602HC_K6602HC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.18% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive241% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602HC_K6602HC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K6602HC
Memory3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 10:37
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-11900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.9% Outstanding
Memory 68.8
1-Core 166
2-Core 317
96% 184 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 980
99% 803 Pts
64-Core 1,344
83% 1,344 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 92.9%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 15DD) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1371
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.18% Terrible
Lighting 9.2
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 10.6
8% 30 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 10.1
10% 11.8 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.18%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
364GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1132 1242 1272 1346 1103 30 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
241% Outstanding
Read 2,099
Write 1,372
Mixed 1,135
SusWrite 1,021
313% 1,407 MB/s
4K Read 60.1
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 74.7
250% 84.8 MB/s
DQ Read 444
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 414
296% 382 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 241%
Great: 297%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1G44BB0-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
65.2% Good
MC Read 26
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 18.8
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 33.3
SC Mixed 16.6
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602HC_K6602HC Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop K6602HC_K6602HC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback