Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics7.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive54.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20130529
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '22 at 10:32
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$134
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-2600 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 94.9
1-Core 90.9
2-Core 169
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 371
41% 322 Pts
64-Core 457
28% 457 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7750
MSI(1462 2792) 1GB
CLim: 830 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
7.71% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 15.4
Parallax 13.9
7% 12.7 fps
MRender 11.9
Gravity 9.6
Splatting 10.2
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.71%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 112 106 107 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 202
Write 148
Mixed 141
SusWrite 107
33% 149 MB/s
4K Read 25.2
4K Write 61.9
4K Mixed 30.9
110% 39.3 MB/s
DQ Read 90.9
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 109
86% 117 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 73%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
272GB free
Firmware: 03200001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 407 353 75 70 70 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
77.5% Very good
Read 460
Write 414
Mixed 346
SusWrite 213
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 57.3
4K Mixed 37.1
126% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 124
102% 144 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 9905403-559.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
57.1% Above average
MC Read 19.5
MC Write 20.7
MC Mixed 18.6
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.5
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 57.4
70% 57.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77N-WIFI Builds (Compare 222 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77N-WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback