Asrock H97 Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive88% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H97 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160613
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '17 at 18:59
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4170-$59
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Memory 93.7
1-Core 107
2-Core 196
78% 132 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 282
38% 283 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3769) 2GB
CLim: 1331 MHz, MLim: 1516 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 35.7
Reflection 32.4
Parallax 40.8
29% 36.3 fps
Gravity 43.3
Splatting 36.3
35% 39.8 fps
Poor: 24% Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
74GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
88% Excellent
Read 481
Write 341
Mixed 341
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 20.8
127% 44.2 MB/s
DQ Read 288
DQ Write 212
DQ Mixed 35.8
85% 179 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88%
Great: 108%
OCZ SOLID3 60GB
40GB free
Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 187
Write 63
Mixed 90.3
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 18.8
4K Write 60.7
4K Mixed 11.6
75% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 77.5
DQ Write 62
DQ Mixed 22.9
30% 54.1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$90
275GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 103
Write 101
Mixed 94.9
75% 99.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.82
4K Mixed 0.44
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 160GB (2007)-$21
141GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
55.4% Above average
Read 97
Write 95.9
Mixed 94.2
72% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.47
4K Mixed 0.26
78% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 55.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
60.9% Good
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 19.3
59% 20.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 20.1
SC Mixed 20.6
55% 19.3 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97 Pro4 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H97 Pro4 - $287

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $709
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback