Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H55M-S2V  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.5 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100820
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 17 '20 at 10:55
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 661-$80
Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Memory 30.8
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 129
45% 82.5 Pts
4-Core 35.8
8-Core 42.9
5% 39.3 Pts
64-Core 40.1
2% 40.1 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 55%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
32% Below average
Lighting 18.1
Reflection 88
Parallax 83.9
15% 63.3 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 83
Splatting 71.9
66% 81.2 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 32%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
157GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 94 103 105 107 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 179
Write 168
Mixed 174
SusWrite 104
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 22.1
4K Mixed 18.5
56% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 37.2
70% 139 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 94 93 96 105 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36% Below average
Read 190
Write 156
Mixed 160
SusWrite 93.5
34% 150 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 18.3
4K Mixed 15.7
57% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 39.4
DQ Mixed 10.1
35% 82.1 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 36%
Great: 124%
OCZ SOLID3 60GB
21GB free
Firmware: 2.15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 58 52 67 57 57 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Read 143
Write 56.7
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 58.6
19% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 12.1
4K Write 28.4
4K Mixed 12.2
49% 17.6 MB/s
DQ Read 40.9
DQ Write 58.8
DQ Mixed 68.2
46% 56 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 50%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
543GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 64 62 66 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 67.3
Write 79.8
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 62.9
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.5
160% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 75%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
221GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 79 85 88 90 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 64.3
Write 58.2
Mixed 55.4
SusWrite 85.7
49% 65.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
9.1% Terrible
MC Read 3.1
MC Write 2.9
MC Mixed 2.4
8% 2.8 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 4.4
10% 3.33 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 9.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H55M-S2V Builds (Compare 161 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H55M-S2V

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $88
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback