MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive212% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B17
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17)  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180831
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 23:42
Run Duration168 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
97.9% Outstanding
Memory 95.9
1-Core 143
2-Core 286
97% 175 Pts
4-Core 536
8-Core 893
87% 715 Pts
64-Core 1,176
73% 1,176 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 5000 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.86
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (163 fps cap detected)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 162
Reflection 162
Parallax 162
132% 162 fps
MRender 163
Gravity 163
Splatting 163
133% 163 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 126%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 923 657 660 655 644 613 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
212% Outstanding
Read 1,594
Write 2,023
Mixed 1,305
SusWrite 692
316% 1,403 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 90.5
4K Mixed 62.4
204% 67.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,039
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 970
722% 959 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 212%
Great: 340%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
107GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,622
Write 2,025
Mixed 1304
370% 1,650 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 88.4
4K Mixed 63.9
203% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,082
DQ Write 891
DQ Mixed 1,004
747% 992 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
1TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 105 104 106 102 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 102
Write 113
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 104
62% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 108%
SAMSUNG HD153WI 1.5TB
797GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 31 32 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
17.6% Very poor
Read 50.5
Write 30.6
Mixed 27.9
SusWrite 31.9
45% 35.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.4
52% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 20%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
925GB free, PID 0400
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 177 181 182 182 177 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
68.5% Good
Read 167
Write 161
Mixed 79
SusWrite 180
196% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 68.5%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2666 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 32.6
MC Mixed 24.8
87% 30.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 27.9
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 54.3
74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) Builds (Compare 14,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7B17) - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 115% - Outstanding Total price: $812
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback