Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive478% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 20:07
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Memory 81.1
1-Core 134
2-Core 269
88% 161 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 570
71% 541 Pts
64-Core 600
37% 600 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2287 MHz, MLim: 4126 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 140
Reflection 129
Parallax 133
114% 134 fps
MRender 148
Gravity 111
Splatting 96.5
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 46 43 44 45 48 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
478% Outstanding
Read 5,624
Write 43.5
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 44.4
301% 1,450 MB/s
4K Read 622
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 4.1
949% 209 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 478%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
110GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 452 371 344 358 321 390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,454
Write 1,177
Mixed 1,224
SusWrite 373
236% 1,057 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 51.8
178% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,113
DQ Write 578
DQ Mixed 771
593% 821 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 173%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
180GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 8,006
Write 5,645
Mixed 6,494
1,491% 6,715 MB/s
4K Read 558
4K Write 178
4K Mixed 253
1,264% 330 MB/s
DQ Read 1,329
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 448
414% 669 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
MC Read 40
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 38.2
97% 33.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 33.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,052 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback