Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 65%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics104% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive413% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 07:48
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 72.6
1-Core 137
2-Core 275
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 605
50% 433 Pts
64-Core 644
40% 644 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8816) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2310 MHz, MLim: 4125 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 127
Parallax 131
110% 131 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 108
Splatting 94.7
94% 118 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
62GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 25 29 30 34 34 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
413% Outstanding
Read 4,486
Write 39.5
Mixed 55.5
SusWrite 27
239% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 577
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 3.1
879% 194 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 413%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
150GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 163 253 301 368 323 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
213% Outstanding
Read 1,941
Write 1,184
Mixed 1,470
SusWrite 264
270% 1,215 MB/s
4K Read 49.2
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 71.6
235% 83.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,215
DQ Write 857
DQ Mixed 985
749% 1,019 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 213%
Great: 355%
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$100
111GB free
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 5,550
Write 5400
Mixed 989
877% 3,980 MB/s
4K Read 449
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 165
961% 248 MB/s
DQ Read 802
DQ Write 615
DQ Mixed 664
508% 694 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 36.2
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 36.7
92% 32.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 18.6
SC Mixed 31
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 95.4
42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,054 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $115

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $935
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback