Dell Precision T7600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemDell Precision T7600
MotherboardDell Precision T7600  (all builds)
Memory55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190630
Uptime13.5 Days
Run DateDec 01 '22 at 13:26
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
63.9% Good
Memory 78.8
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 130
56% 92 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 472
44% 369 Pts
64-Core 1,317
82% 1,317 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
69.3% Good
Lighting 87.7
Reflection 87.4
Parallax 78.6
72% 84.6 fps
MRender 91.4
Gravity 81.1
Splatting 70
65% 80.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 81%
AMD FirePro W9000-$3,600
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 34.8
Parallax 56.9
37% 45.8 fps
MRender 30.5
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 24.6
28% 34.7 fps
Poor: 33%
This bench: 34%
Great: 37%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 443 443 434 430 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 470
Mixed 363
SusWrite 433
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 29.8
4K Write 58.4
4K Mixed 36.4
123% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 358
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 315
238% 320 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 124%
Ibm-esxs ST3300555SS 300GB
219GB free
Firmware: BA38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 80.7
Write 49.7
Mixed 52.7
SusWrite 50.3
43% 58.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.1
191% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70DB0-YK0 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
51.5% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 18.2
MC Mixed 18.3
56% 19.6 GB/s
SC Read 12
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 6.3
23% 7.97 GB/s
Latency 82.9
48% 82.9 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision T7600 Builds (Compare 701 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Dell Precision T7600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback