PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 69.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 98.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Dell Precision T7600 |
Motherboard | Dell Precision T7600 (all builds) |
Memory | 55.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20190630 |
Uptime | 13.5 Days |
Run Date | Dec 01 '22 at 13:26 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 3% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0
CPU 1, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
|
63.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Zotac(19DA 3527) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
69.3%
Good
|
|||
AMD FirePro W9000-$3,600
AMD(1002 031E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 21.Q2.1
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$113
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 434 443 443 434 430 416 MB/s
|
98.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
Ibm-esxs ST3300555SS 300GB
219GB free
Firmware: BA38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 50 50 50 MB/s
|
37.7%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung-00CE M393B2G70DB0-YK0 4x16GB
4 of 16 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
51.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2687W 01stBench 71%, 1,646 samples | 96x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 78x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2680 01stBench 67%, 1,642 samples | 76x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro K5000NvidiaBench 21%, 3,775 samples | 39x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 36x |
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples | 35x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $94 |