Monster ABRA A5 V1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics17.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemMonster ABRA A5 V1  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER ABRA A5 V1
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140408
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 07 '17 at 15:08
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4710MQ-$44
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 83.3
1-Core 97.4
2-Core 175
70% 119 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 479
50% 400 Pts
64-Core 472
29% 472 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 860M
Clevo(1558 3501) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8800
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
17.2% Very poor
Lighting 21.8
Reflection 15.9
Parallax 20.3
18% 19.3 fps
MRender 23.7
Gravity 21.5
Splatting 15.7
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 17.2%
Great: 17%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
TOSHIBA-TL100 480GB
319GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z32080RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
Read 490
Write 248
Mixed 190
68% 309 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 4.13
62% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 24.9
DQ Write 281
DQ Mixed 0.05
46% 102 MB/s
WD Black 2.5" 750GB (2013)-$60
119GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 119
Write 115
Mixed 98.4
83% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1.98
4K Mixed 0.22
80% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5428-078.A00LF GKH800SO51208-1600 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
31.7% Below average
MC Read 11.2
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 8.6
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.6
30% 10.7 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ABRA A5 V1 Builds (Compare 56 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster ABRA A5 V1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $44
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback