Alienware Aurora R13

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 109%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAlienware Aurora R13  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 0446JC
Memory50 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221007
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 20:13
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900KF-$266
U3E1, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Memory 66.6
1-Core 205
2-Core 411
115% 228 Pts
4-Core 809
8-Core 1,377
133% 1,093 Pts
64-Core 2,719
168% 2,719 Pts
Poor: 110%
This bench: 109%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
Dell(1028 3880) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.98
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 319
Reflection 306
Parallax 336
260% 320 fps
Gravity 258
Splatting 190
194% 224 fps
Poor: 185% Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme PC801 SK hynix 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 51003141 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 4,546
Write 4,174
Mixed 2,979
867% 3,900 MB/s
4K Read 67.6
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 108
338% 120 MB/s
DQ Read 1,176
DQ Write 925
DQ Mixed 1,085
802% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 214% Great: 582%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OAE10
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 188
Write 197
Mixed 23.2
98% 136 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
167% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown HMCG88MEBUA084N 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 4400 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
123% Outstanding
MC Read 45.6
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 47.3
136% 47.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 37.9
SC Mixed 28.3
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 123%
This bench: 123%
Great: 154%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora R13 Builds (Compare 905 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 251%
UFO

System: Alienware Aurora R13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $816
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback