Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 21% Surfboard	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 18.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi innovation and technology(shenzhen)co.,ltd HeroBook Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220120
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 30 '22 at 18:15
Run Duration	186 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	74%

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	18.5% Very poor	Memory 28.1 1-Core 31.3 2-Core 31.7 20% 30.4 Pts	4-Core 52.5 8-Core 52.9 7% 52.7 Pts	64-Core 45.9 3% 45.9 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.5% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	0.98% Terrible	Lighting 1 Reflection 0.4 Parallax 1.3 1% 0.9 fps	MRender 1.7 Gravity 1.2 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.98% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3256B-A0 256GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK62A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 276 173 145 141 209 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	42.7% Average	Read 194 Write 100 Mixed 243 SusWrite 204 42% 185 MB/s	4K Read 15.4 4K Write 28.2 4K Mixed 16.1 59% 19.9 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 79.5 DQ Mixed 92.7 70% 96 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 42.7% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 3.3 MC Write 4.3 MC Mixed 4.4 11% 4 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.5 SC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.93 GB/s	Latency 266 15% 266 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020CIntelBench 19%, 108 samples	15x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	12x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	27x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	27x