Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9.87%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	0.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Chuwi innovation and technology(shenzhen)co.,ltd HeroBook Pro (all builds)
Motherboard	To To be filled by O.E.M.
Memory	3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20220120
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 24 '22 at 14:14
Run Duration	275 Seconds
Run User	ECU-User
Background CPU	100%

PC Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4020 5,047 User benchmarks, average bench 21% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	9.87% Terrible	Memory 9.95 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 30.6 12% 21.2 Pts	4-Core 57.8 8-Core 50.2 7% 54 Pts	64-Core 46.7 3% 46.7 Pts
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.87% Great: 29%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Device(0000 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2112 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	0.24% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 0.3 Parallax 0.4 0% 0.3 fps	MRender 0.4 Gravity 0.4 Splatting 0.6 0% 0.47 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.24% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8P0S3256B-A0 256GB 154 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 201GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFK62A3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 127 139 153 220 135 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	33.1% Below average	Read 219 Write 183 Mixed 185 SusWrite 157 42% 186 MB/s	4K Read 8.9 4K Write 14.9 4K Mixed 10.5 35% 11.4 MB/s	DQ Read 107 DQ Write 71 DQ Mixed 77.2 61% 85 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 2.9 MC Write 5.2 MC Mixed 4.7 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 2 SC Write 2.9 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 404 10% 404 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 24%

Surfboard

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N4020CIntelBench 19%, 108 samples	15x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	12x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	27x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	27x