Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive225% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 1  (all builds)
Memory39.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210713
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 12:58
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
79.7% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 123
2-Core 222
84% 146 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 507
54% 432 Pts
64-Core 542
34% 542 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 42.8
Reflection 40.4
Parallax 38.1
35% 40.4 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 41.5
Splatting 27.1
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$94
774GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1230 1499 1561 1472 1471 1534 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
225% Outstanding
Read 1,258
Write 1,885
Mixed 1,278
SusWrite 1,461
333% 1,470 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 50.8
176% 59.6 MB/s
DQ Read 860
DQ Write 524
DQ Mixed 698
518% 694 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 225%
Great: 365%
Samsung SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
379GB free
Firmware: CXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1407 1395 1347 1414 1384 1322 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
268% Outstanding
Read 2,232
Write 1194
Mixed 729
SusWrite 1,378
307% 1,383 MB/s
4K Read 34.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 60
184% 66 MB/s
DQ Read 948
DQ Write 682
DQ Mixed 806
605% 812 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 268%
Great: 306%
WD WD2005VBYZ-02RRWB2 2TB
26GB free
Firmware: RR07
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 103 93 97 123 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 117
Write 126
Mixed 85
SusWrite 108
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 0.8
259% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 105%
WD Gold 2TB (2016)-$97
16GB free
Firmware: RR04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 89 96 88 95 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.2% Good
Read 116
Write 132
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 92.7
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1
230% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 60.2%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
95.6% Outstanding
MC Read 34.1
MC Write 37.3
MC Mixed 30.4
97% 33.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 40.8
SC Mixed 29.3
85% 29.8 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 95.6%
Great: 139%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 804 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 1 - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $688
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback