HP Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics45.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 885E
Memory8.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220613
Uptime10 Days
Run DateNov 30 '22 at 01:52
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
11th Gen Intel Core i7-11700T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 78
1-Core 140
2-Core 158
76% 125 Pts
4-Core 466
8-Core 752
75% 609 Pts
64-Core 993
62% 993 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
HP(103C 885E) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
45.4% Average
Lighting 59.6
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 51.9
49% 58.2 fps
MRender 41.4
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 49.3
39% 47.5 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 45.4%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,430
Write 903
Mixed 922
240% 1085 MB/s
4K Read 45.3
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 67
233% 86.7 MB/s
DQ Read 678
DQ Write 724
DQ Mixed 578
468% 660 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
WD WD10SPSX-60A6WT0 1TB
489GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 111 109 110 113 109 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
68.8% Good
Read 128
Write 118
Mixed 70.2
SusWrite 110
78% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
148% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.8%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.1% Very good
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 19.2
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.8
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 20.3
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion All-in-One 27-d1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback