Asus H61M-A/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive46.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H61M-A/BR  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140624
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateNov 29 '22 at 23:46
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$134
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Memory 91.6
1-Core 91
2-Core 173
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 282
8-Core 408
43% 345 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36.9% Below average
Lighting 42.3
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 66.8
34% 55.9 fps
MRender 58.4
Gravity 53.8
Splatting 43.2
42% 51.8 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
KingstonSA400S37 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW201105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 155 127 58 32 39 30 MB/s
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
46.8% Average
Read 253
Write 221
Mixed 190
SusWrite 73.3
41% 185 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 56.8
4K Mixed 13.7
91% 33 MB/s
DQ Read 101
DQ Write 170
DQ Mixed 20
48% 97.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 69%
WD WD1600AABS-00PRA0 160GB
36GB free
Firmware: 05.06H05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 57 58 57 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 56.6
Mixed 41.7
SusWrite 56.6
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
123% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905474-050.A00LF 99U5474-016.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 13.9
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 13
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 64.8
62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61M-A/BR Builds (Compare 526 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H61M-A/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback