Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 13% Tree trunk	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (1st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 99 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	53.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8265U 87,841 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 0.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	9% Terrible	Memory 13.9 1-Core 11.1 2-Core 10.8 8% 11.9 Pts	4-Core 22.8 8-Core 37.7 4% 30.2 Pts	64-Core 32.5 2% 32.5 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 9% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 178,291 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Legend(17AA 5072) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9749 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	1.43% Terrible	Lighting 1.6 Reflection 1.4 Parallax 1.9 1% 1.63 fps	MRender 1.8 Gravity 2 Splatting 2.2 2% 2 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.43% Great: 6%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZALQ256HBJD-00BL1 256GB 693 User benchmarks, average bench 157% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: 7L1QFXM7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 244 201 235 329 312 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 589 Write 459 Mixed 460 SusWrite 262 99% 442 MB/s	4K Read 16.4 4K Write 12.2 4K Mixed 8.8 43% 12.5 MB/s	DQ Read 46.4 DQ Write 33.7 DQ Mixed 38.7 29% 39.6 MB/s
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 214%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GB 108,106 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	21% Poor	MC Read 8.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 8.5 23% 8.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 4.1 11% 3.7 GB/s	Latency 369 11% 369 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 21% Great: 84%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-8265UIntelBench 53%, 87,841 samples	4x

GPU
UHD Graphics 620IntelBench 5%, 178,291 samples	4x

SSD
TOSHIBA 512GBKbg30zmt512gBench 127%, 393 samples	3x
MZALQ256HBJD-00BL1 256GBSamsungBench 157%, 693 samples	1x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	1x
Vengeance SODIM DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBCorsairBench 78%, 2,464 samples	1x
M471A1K43DB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 54,121 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16