Lenovo 81BT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81BT  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory9.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 12:46
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User LBN-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 68.5
1-Core 54.2
2-Core 101
46% 74.4 Pts
4-Core 178
8-Core 261
27% 220 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 39B2) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
4.6% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.5
6% 8.57 fps
MRender 0.3
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 0.3
2% 2.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.6%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WAYSH-240G 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.002
SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 351 319 169 46 155 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
64.5% Good
Read 446
Write 410
Mixed 329
SusWrite 232
79% 354 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 39.6
4K Mixed 23.6
79% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 78.1
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 121
109% 158 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 80%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 23.6
MC Mixed 18.5
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.4
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 14.1
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81BT Builds (Compare 552 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81BT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback