PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files. |
Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | Fujitsu CELSIUS M7010power (all builds) |
Motherboard | FUJITSU D3498-U2 |
Memory | 36.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20220202 |
Uptime | 7 Days |
Run Date | Nov 28 '22 at 11:46 |
Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
Run User | POL-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-10940X
CPU0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
|
81%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia T1000
Nvidia(10DE 12DB) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
37.2%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M378A4G43AB2-CWE 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2934 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
53.5%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Xeon W-2225IntelBench 79%, 523 samples | 9x |
Xeon W-2245IntelBench 88%, 471 samples | 5x |
Core i9-10920XIntel $850Bench 87%, 3,007 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro RTX 4000NvidiaBench 98%, 9,173 samples | 11x |
Quadro P400NvidiaBench 9%, 5,817 samples | 2x |
Quadro RTX 5000NvidiaBench 131%, 1,749 samples | 2x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER |