Exper ACTIVEDEX299

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemExper ACTIVEDEX299  (all builds)
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD (MS-7996)
Memory7.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170921
Uptime247.9 Days
Run DateNov 28 '22 at 08:44
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$40
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
59.4% Above average
Memory 72.4
1-Core 94.4
2-Core 186
67% 117 Pts
4-Core 270
8-Core 268
36% 269 Pts
64-Core 286
18% 286 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7996) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
2.96% Terrible
Lighting 5.4
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 5.5
4% 4.6 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.96%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 240GB
170GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 322 327 331 340 348 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 419
Write 352
Mixed 311
SusWrite 324
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 70.3
4K Mixed 14.5
87% 35.1 MB/s
DQ Read 124
DQ Write 292
DQ Mixed 28.8
73% 148 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
930GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 195 199 196 198 193 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 185
Write 158
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 195
114% 156 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 109%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 859B CT4G4DFS824A.M8FB 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.6% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 15.4
MC Mixed 13
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.9
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ACTIVEDEX299 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Exper ACTIVEDEX299

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $40
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback