Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results


Gaming 36% Jet ski	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 31% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	39% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 9 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8Z77-V LX (all builds)
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140721
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 28 '22 at 02:15
Run Duration	238 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Memory 95.6 1-Core 111 2-Core 212 81% 139 Pts	4-Core 358 8-Core 589 58% 473 Pts	64-Core 600 37% 600 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% EVGA(3842 2774) 2GB CLim: 1417 MHz, MLim: 1877 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 472.12 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	39% Below average	Lighting 45.7 Reflection 41.2 Parallax 2 37% 29.6 fps	MRender 57.8 Gravity 56.1 Splatting 45 42% 53 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 39% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$139 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 5,676 Write 4,666 Mixed 4,944 1,135% 5,095 MB/s	4K Read 306 4K Write 184 4K Mixed 216 837% 235 MB/s	DQ Read 913 DQ Write 429 DQ Mixed 645 485% 662 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 724GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 193 220 249 250 245 MB/s Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71% Very good	Read 257 Write 244 Mixed 232 SusWrite 228 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 76.9 4K Mixed 35.6 132% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 91.9 DQ Mixed 123 95% 132 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71% Great: 121%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 332GB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 58 67 78 78 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	42.4% Average	Read 76.2 Write 76.3 Mixed 58.9 SusWrite 71.2 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.8 156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 392GB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 61 66 79 78 79 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 87 Write 84.4 Mixed 51.7 SusWrite 71.9 54% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$100 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 363GB free Firmware: 82.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 64 68 81 83 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	42.3% Average	Read 72.3 Write 78.4 Mixed 56.7 SusWrite 74.6 52% 70.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.9 174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 88%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$145 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 119 135 146 144 143 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Read 148 Write 159 Mixed 95.9 SusWrite 136 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.8 4K Mixed 1.7 373% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 110%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$145 4,534 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 412GB free Firmware: 81.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 77 91 100 95 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Read 99.9 Write 113 Mixed 70.5 SusWrite 90.6 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 6.6 4K Mixed 1.6 358% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 110%
ST310005 28AS 1TB 52 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 225GB free, PID 0c25 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 30 36 38 38 38 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 36.1 Write 37.1 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 35.4 46% 34.2 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.9 73% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 186C0 V3 Series 4x8GB 214 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	62.4% Good	MC Read 21 MC Write 23.1 MC Mixed 18.9 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 18.9 SC Write 20.9 SC Mixed 20.9 58% 20.2 GB/s	Latency 55.4 72% 55.4 ns
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 62.4% Great: 98%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 5,662 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX

CPU
Core i5-3570KIntel $30Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	1,419x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	1,172x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	1,082x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	378x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	371x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	309x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	214x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	196x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	149x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	138x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	131x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	106x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $258

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16