Samsung 950QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 109%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics132% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 950QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP950QED-KB1US
Memory9.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 21:23
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1260P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 61.7
1-Core 166
2-Core 314
94% 181 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 820
86% 687 Pts
64-Core 1,180
73% 1,180 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.98
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
132% Outstanding
Lighting 186
Reflection 175
Parallax 188
152% 183 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 138
Splatting 118
116% 146 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 132%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TB
657GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1081 1277 1324 1363 1309 1337 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 696
Write 1,141
Mixed 787
SusWrite 1,282
222% 976 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 82.9
4K Mixed 47.7
154% 54.3 MB/s
DQ Read 700
DQ Write 288
DQ Mixed 549
392% 512 MB/s
Poor: 135%
This bench: 176%
Great: 264%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LKBKB@BM-MGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (92nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
139% Outstanding
MC Read 60.9
MC Write 53.1
MC Mixed 49.6
156% 54.5 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 43.1
SC Mixed 24.2
82% 28.6 GB/s
Latency 123
33% 123 ns
Poor: 78%
This bench: 139%
Great: 143%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 950QED Builds (Compare 255 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 950QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback