Intel E5 M2L-8D

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
18 months ago, 18 months ago.
MotherboardIntel E5 M2L-8D  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 09:48
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2660 v2
SOCKET 0, 2 CPU, 20 cores, 40 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 58.2
2-Core 116
48% 80.3 Pts
4-Core 232
8-Core 535
44% 383 Pts
64-Core 1,736
107% 1,736 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 522.30
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Lighting 175
Reflection 194
Parallax 190
143% 187 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 188
Splatting 129
122% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 129%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 421
Write 408
Mixed 397
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 51.4
4K Mixed 34.6
112% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 332
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 281
213% 288 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$120
2TB free
Firmware: 0A80
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 84.3
Write 116
Mixed 73.3
68% 91.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
122% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M392B2G70BM0- 1x16GB
1 of 16 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
22.9% Poor
MC Read 9.5
MC Write 6.1
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 8.3
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.3
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.9%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical E5 M2L-8D Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Intel E5 M2L-8D

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 109% - Outstanding Total price: $170
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback