Lenovo 10FGS01400

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.12% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive48.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FGS01400  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 30BC
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170412
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 27 '22 at 08:50
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 108
2-Core 208
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 386
8-Core 573
60% 480 Pts
64-Core 606
38% 606 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Device(1642 3F86) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.54
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
6.12% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 8.6
6% 7.97 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 6.8
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.12%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
107GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF4304RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 72 77 57 66 78 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 434
Write 361
Mixed 297
SusWrite 89.8
66% 295 MB/s
4K Read 19.9
4K Write 38.9
4K Mixed 15.9
71% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 80.5
DQ Mixed 19.2
35% 71.2 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 56%
Sandisk PLUS 2000GB
639GB free
Firmware: UP4504RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 152 179 171 181 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
49.2% Average
Read 434
Write 257
Mixed 107
SusWrite 184
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 37.4
4K Mixed 5.5
58% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 119
DQ Write 83.6
DQ Mixed 33.1
43% 78.6 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 4x4GB-$221
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73% Very good
MC Read 26.1
MC Write 29
MC Mixed 22.9
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.7
63% 21.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FGS01400 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FGS01400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $391
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback