Acer Extensa 215-54G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Extensa 215-54G  (all builds)
MotherboardTGL Jameson_TL
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220422
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 20:12
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1135G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 132
2-Core 233
80% 145 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 566
61% 485 Pts
64-Core 604
37% 604 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce MX350
Acer(1025 1465) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2698
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Lighting 24.9
Reflection 26.2
Parallax 25.3
20% 25.5 fps
MRender 17.9
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 18.3
16% 19.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
413GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1307 1293 1309 1407 715 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,835
Write 1,212
Mixed 1118
SusWrite 1,023
290% 1,297 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 68.3
231% 79.7 MB/s
DQ Read 446
DQ Write 387
DQ Mixed 414
311% 416 MB/s
Poor: 99%
This bench: 226%
Great: 297%
Seagate ST1000LM014-SSHD-8GB 1TB
916GB free
Firmware: LVD4
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 113 115 114 114 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 95.9
Write 81.9
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 114
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.5
313% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
68.6% Good
MC Read 24.7
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 20.7
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 12.8
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Extensa 215-54G Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Extensa 215-54G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback