Notebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive206% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemNotebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '22 at 16:22
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11800H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Memory 71.1
1-Core 158
2-Core 308
94% 179 Pts
4-Core 579
8-Core 876
90% 727 Pts
64-Core 1,216
75% 1,216 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 5015) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.1340
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Lighting 9.4
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 9.8
8% 32.2 fps
MRender 12.4
Gravity 11.7
Splatting 9
9% 11 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SSD 500GB
403GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFA15.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1519 1528 960 620 652 672 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
206% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 1,554
Mixed 1,228
SusWrite 992
277% 1,224 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 85.4
4K Mixed 52.5
168% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 927
DQ Mixed 1,049
795% 1,075 MB/s
Poor: 110%
This bench: 206%
Great: 240%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA32A.C4FE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
70% Good
MC Read 26.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 20.2
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 38.8
SC Mixed 18.1
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 70%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx Builds (Compare 120 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Notebook NH5x_NH7x_HHx_HJx_HKx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback